Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML)

Date of document March 2023
This is the current valid version of the document


Diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is based on the detection of monocytes in the blood associated with dysplasia in the bone marrow. Exclusion of reactive monocytosis is mandatory. Additional cytogenetic and molecular evaluations are essential. CMML may present like myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) with concomitant monocytosis (leukocytes <13,000/µl) or like myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) (leukocytes ≥13.000/µl). Risk scores such as the CPSS and the CPSS-molecular allow estimation of the prognosis of patients in terms of overall survival and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). CMML is mainly a disease of advanced age. Patients with dysplastic CMML usually suffer from the consequences of hematopoietic insufficiency, whereas patients with proliferative CMML more often have constitutional symptoms and organomegaly.

Improving quality of life and prolongation of life expectancy are the main goals of therapy. The mode of therapy should always be adapted individually. Supportive measures are of utmost importantance and cytoreduction is recommended in cases with high leucocyte counts. The only curative therapy is allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), which is only applicable in a minority of patients due to age and frequent comorbidities. Azacitidine is approved for patients with high-risk dysplastic CMML who are ineligible for SCT, and some patients benefit from the response to the drug. Other agents are not approved to date.


2.1[Chapter not relevant]


Chronic myelomonocytic leukemias (CMML), like all myeloid/myelodysplastic neoplasms, are rare diseases. With a proportion of about 20% of MDS, the incidence is around 0.5-1.0 per 100,000 per year. More men than women are affected (ratio about 2:1) with a median age at diagnosis around 76 years. With the current changes in population structure, this results in an increasing prevalence and higher incidence at advanced ages [1].


CMML are malignant diseases characterized by clonal hematopoiesis in the bone marrow. In more than 90% of patients, one or more somatic mutations are detectable by NGS (next generation sequencing). The mutations are devided into four categories:

  • epigenetic regulator genes, such as EZH2, ASXL1, TET2, DNMT3A, IDH1, and IDH2,

  • mutations in the spliceosome such as SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1 and others,

  • mutations affecting DNA repair mechanisms (TP53),

  • mutations affecting tyrosine kinases and transcription factors such as JAK2, KRAS, NRAS, RUNX1.

It is likely that multiple mutations occur in a staggered fashion, with the first mutations often found in the TET2 or the ASXL1 gene. Subsequently.second and probably more additional events occur, which then trigger the development of the disease. The most common mutations found in CMML are TET2 (60%), SRSF2 (50%), ASXL1 (40%) and RAS (10-30%). Regarding the phenotype of CMML with always associated monocytosis, one theory is that immature dysplastic granulocytes of the CMML clone produce α-defensin protein, which then inhibit macrophage colony-stimulating factor-induced differentiation of monocytic cells, leading to the presence of immature monocytes [23].

2.4Risk factors

Risk factors include exposure to organic solvents, prior radiation therapy, radioiodine therapy, and chemotherapy. Benzene were no proved risk factor in a cohort study, but this remains controversial. Notably, in cigarette smoking, the risk factor benzene accumulates as a major product. If relevant occupational exposure to organic solvents is suspected, a report should be made to the respective professional association [456].

3Prevention and early detection

There is no possibility of prevention for CMML. Measures for early detection of CMML are not available. In general, noxious agents (chemotherapy, radiotherapy), that are indicated because of another serious disease cannot be avoided because of their potential of inducing CMML as a second neoplasm, after years.

3.1[Chapter not relevant]

3.2Early detection

3.2.1Individuals at-risk

CMML are diseases of the elderly, which mostly manifest after the age of 60 years. Only 3% of CMML patients are under 50 years of age, so age per se is a risk factor for developing CMML. For unknown reasons, men develop the disease about twice as often as women. About 10% of CMML cases are therapy-associated (t-CMML) and are associated with high-risk cytogenetics and poor prognosis, comparable to therapy-associated MDS. There is a median of 6 years between exposure and initial diagnosis of t-CMML. Secondary CMML that develops from preexisting MDS is rare. CMML without evidence of diasease-inducing factors is classified as primary CMML. Possible effects of environmental factors on the development of CMML have not extensively been investigated. However, due to the similarity to MDS, CMML is supposed to have similar risk factors as MDS. These include exposure to solvents (benzene), cytotoxic substances (especially alkylants, topoisomerase II inhibitors) or radioactive radiation. Furthermore, chronic inflammation (e.g. autoimmune diseases such as polymyalgia rheumatica) seems to support the development of CMML. Smokers and former smokers appear to be at higher risk for CMML compared with nonsmokers. There is no known hereditary cause of adult CMML, although there are rare germline mutations that may be associated with CMML [78]. Especially, DDX41, a rare germline mutation favors the development of CMML [9].

4Clinical manifestation


In a large proportion of patients, CMML is diagnosed incidentally by an otherwise indicated blood test. Only a small proportion of patients have clinical symptoms that lead to diagnostis. General symptoms such as night sweats, weight loss, fatigue, and a reduced general condition are usual. The clinical symptoms of CMML are most fequently caused by the hematopoietic insufficiency. The clinical presentation is more similar to MDS or chronic MPN, with one of the two components becoming more prominent in the individual case. Patients with an MDS phenotype (MD-CMML) (leukocytes <13,000 µl) often have cytopenia in the peripheral blood with associated sequelae, such as neutropenia-related infections, thrombocytopenia with associated bleeding, and anemia requiring transfusion. At diagnosis, severe bleeding caused by thrombocytopenia is uncommon; petechiae, gingival bleeding, and a tendency to hematoma are more frequent. In the proliferative phenotype (MP-CMML) (leukocytes ≥13,000 /µl), splenomegaly, mostly asymptomatic, is present in approximately 50% of cases, hepatomegaly and lymphadenopathy are less frequent. Infiltration of myelomonocytic cells in the skin, pleura, and peritoneum may occur, particularly with leukocyte counts of ≥13000/µl in the peripheral blood. In a proportion of patients, CMML transforms into acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with a frequency of 15-30%. An increase of monocytes in the blood per se is not sufficient to postulate a progression of CMML, as infecions can also cause higher monocyte counts, which regress under successful treatment.

CMML is associated with autoimmune diseases more frequently than MDS. An autoimmune disease is present in approximately 20% of cases in CMML. Vasculitis, idiopathic thrombocytopenia (ITP), psoriasis, rheumatoid polyarthritis, and neutrophilic dermatosis (Sweet syndrome) are most common. Autoimmune phenomena may precede the initial diagnosis of CMML by years [10].

4.2Incidental findings

Due to the tendency of monocytes to migrate into various tissues, monocytic organ infiltrations are not rare in CMML and are mostly associated with high peripheral leukocyte counts. Meningeosis leukaemica occurs very rarely and usually reflects a transition to acute leukemia. Gingival hyperplasia, which is frequent in monocytic differentiated acute leukemias, can rarely occur in CMML and is usually combined with an increase of leukocytes in the peripheral blood.

Thrombocytopenia in patients with CMML does not necessarily reflect dysplastic bone marrow insufficiency or infiltration by leukemic cells, but may rarely be due to classic ITP, which may occur years after the diagnosis of CMML [89]. Usually, these patients show a good response to steroids.

4.3General condition and comorbidity

CMML is a disease of older and therefore more frequently multimorbid patients. In recent years, it has become evident for a number of chronic hematological diseases (MDS, CLL, CML, Hodgkin's lymphoma) that comorbidity is an independent prognostic factor, which significantly influences overall survival. After diagnosis and assessment of prognosis, the therapy of CMML depends in particular on the age, general condition and comorbidities of the respective patient. Mild and asymptomatic cytopenias do not initially require therapy. Only when symptoms appear or proliferation increases therapy is required. Mild therapy with e.g. hydroxyucarbamide or demethylating substances is frequently possible in patients of limited general condition and with comorbidities after benefit-risk assessment. However, the application of these drugs may be difficult in very bad general condition and especially in high Charlson comorbidity index or MDS-CI [11]. For patients scheduled for SCT, the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) is suitable to estimate overall survival and risk of non-relapse-related mortality after allogeneic SCT.


5.1Diagnostic criteria

CMML is usually dignosed when the causes of unclear leukocytosis, monocytosis or cytopenia are investigated. First clinical signs of CMML in older patients may be general symptoms (B symptoms), symptoms of splenomegaly or clinical consequences of cytopenias (anemia, bleeding, infection). Cytopenia, but also leukocytosis (in about 50% of cases) with monocytosis (average around 4.3 G/l) and increased blast counts are possible in the peripheral blood. By definition, CMML presents with persistent monocytosis of >500/µl in the blood, accounting for at least 10% of the leukocyte count, if a genetic aberrant marker is present; if there is lack of a genetic marker, persistent monocytosis of >1000/ µl is mandatory. In addition, 1 to 3 cell lineages in the bone marrow have dysplasia signs. Dysplasias of megakaryopoiesis and granulopoiesis are usually more prominent than of erythropoiesis. Due to monocytic/granulocytic hyperplasia in the bone marrow, erythropoiesis typically accounts for only about 15% of nucleated cells. Esterase staining allows visualizing variable degrees of monocytes in the bone marrow. The blast percentage (including promonocytes) in blood and bone marrow is by definition between 0 and 19%. The abnormal partitioning of peripheral blood monocyte subsets is a supportive criterion for the diagnosis of CMML.

According to the peripheral and medullary blast percentage, two types are distinguished: CMML 1 with peripheral blast percentage <5% and medullary blast percentage <10% and CMML 2 with peripheral blast percentage 5-19% and medullary blast percentage 10-19%. If peripheral and/or medullary blast percentage are ≥20%, a diagnosis of acute leukemia is made. The former CMML 0 subgroup was included into CMML 1 because the prognosis is similar to CMML 1, whereas CMML 2 has an indisputably worse prognosis.

Chromosome analysis is an obligatory part of the diagnosis of CMML. Approximately 80% of patients with CMML have a normal karyotype. Among chromosomal aberrations, loss of genetic material from chromosome 7 and trisomy 8 are more common. Molecular markers such as mutations of ASXL1, TP53, and of other genes are sometimes the only way to identify the clonal nature of the disease. In addition to WHO subgroups 0, 1, and 2, CMML is further classified according to leukocyte count into a dysplastic variant (leukocytes <13,000/µl) (MD-CMML) and a proliferative variant (leukocytes ≥13,000/µl) MP-CMML. The proliferative variant is usually associated with activated RAS pathway and has a worse prognosis. This classification is important from a prognostic point of view, furthermore it reflects the different clinical presentation.

The diagnosis CMML is based on peripheral blood counts and bone marrow aspiration. In Table 1, the diagnostic criteria according to WHO 2022 are represented. Some patients with MDS and concomitant monocytosis formally develop CMML during the diesease course by exceeding 500 or 1000 monocytes/µl. These cases exhibit clinical and molecular characteristics of CMML already at initial diagnosis and are then classified as "oligomonocytic CMML" if they have a chromosomal or molecular genetic abnormality typical of CMML [1217]. A consensus group has developed the minimal diagnostic criteria for CMML in an expanded and more precise form [18]. To avoid misdiagnosis of an underlying systemic mastocytosis with monocytosis, a test for KIT D816V mutation should be included.

Table 1: CMML diagnostic criteria according to WHO 2022 [19] 



1) Prerequisite criteria

 1. persistent monocytosis in peripheral blood (>500/µl over 3 months comprising >10% of leukocytes, with genetically aberrant marker or >1000/ µl comprising >10% of leukocytes, without genetic marker).

no consideration of the monocyte count in the bone marrow

 2. <20% blasts incl. promonocytes in blood and bone marrow.

 3. exclusion of BCR::ABL1 positive CML, PMF, PV and ET.

 4. no evidence of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasia with tyrosine kinase fusion.

should be excluded in cases with eosinophilia (cave: MLN-TK without eosinophilia).

2) Supporting criteria

 1. dysplasia of one or more myeloid lineages (>10% each)

 2. acquired clonal cytogenetic or molecular abnormality (TET2, SRSF2, ASXL1, SETBP1).

 3. abnormal monocyte population in flow cytometry.

from peripheral blood.

3) Requirements for diagnosis

Prerequisite criteria must be present in all cases

If monocytes >1000/µl: one or more supporting criteria must be met.

If monocytes >500/µl and <1000/µl: supporting criteria 1 and 2 must be met.


5.2.1Initial diagnosis

The cytomorphology from peripheral blood and bone marrow including cytochemistry is diagnostically relevant and therefore mandatory. Iron and esterase staining are helpful, desirable are also POX, and PAS staining. Signs of dysplasia, the percentage of blasts (blast equivalent = myeloblasts, monoblasts and promonocytes), monocytic cells and ring sideroblasts are determined. Furthermore, bone marrow histology (fibrosis?, cellularity?) and obligatory oncogenomics (banding cytogenetics, screening for somatic mutations, supplemented or replaced by FISH, if necessary) are highly recommended, as well as imaging for evaluation of spleen size. Immunophenotyping can also be helpful to distinguish between clonal and nonclonal monocytoses by means of co-expression of CD14 and CD16. An increase of monocytes with CD14+/CD16- phenotype (cut off 94%) is highly specific and sensitive for the presence of CMML in contrast to secondary/reactive monocytoses [17]. Molecular genetic testing is mandatory to exclude other diseases (see Table 1), but it is also important with regard to modern prognostic systems and therapy recommendations. The determination of RUNX1, NRAS, SETBP1 and ASXL1 mutations is recommended with regard to their prognostic significance and it is always obligatory if no other prove of diagnosis is present [18]. The extent of mutation screening should be adapted individually and should be targeted and moderate. In most cases, NGS gene analysis panels with the simultaneous analysis of >50 genes are available. The synopsis of the findings frequently enables diagnosis and classification. The diagnostic steps are shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Diagnostics of CMML 




Peripheral blood

  • assessment of dysplasia of granulocytes and platelets

  • quantification of cell counts, incl. monocytes and blasts


Bone marrow smear

  • quantification of the blast fraction

  • esterase staining for estimation of monocyte percentage

  • iron staining for the detection of ring sideroblasts

  • assessment of dysplasia of erythropoiesis, granulopoiesis and megakaryopoiesis


Bone marrow biopsy

  • determination of cellularity and fibrosis



  • recognition of acquired aberrations



  • in case of insufficient banding analysis detection of typical chromosomal aberrations

obligatory, if conventional cytogenetics not possible

Mutation analysis of genes

  • detection of somatic mutations

  • diagnostic: BCR::ABL1, PDGFR α and β, FGFR1, PCM1::JAK2 (exclusion), SRSF2, KIT D816V (exclusion).

  • prognostic: NRAS, RUNX1, ASXL1, SETBP1, SRSF2

obligatory, if diagnostics with other methods are inconclusive, recommended in other cases


  • CD14+/CD16 - Population

recommended, but obligatory if relevant as additional criterion for diagnosis

5.2.2Disease progression

CMML is a chronic disorder. Median survival is between 12 and 36 months. Regular checks of blood counts and of spleen size are mandatory. During therapy or in case of suspected progression (e.g. transition to acute leukemia), the bone marrow examination including the genetic findings have to be re-evaluated. Response criteria have not yet been defined lacking reliable data, but a first proposal has been published [16]. The need for further specific diagnostic measures may arise from individual clinical problems (infections, splenic infarction, extramedullary manifestations).

5.2.3Rare complications

CMML is more frequently associated with various autoimmune diseases as compared to other myeloid neoplasms.


In principle, two different subtypes are distinguished, the dysplastic subtype (more MDS-typical with more cytopenias, dysplasias as well as more frequent cytogenetic aberrations) and the proliferative subtype (more similarity to myeloproliferative neoplasms with more frequent splenomegaly, higher leukocyte counts with left shift and extramedullary manifestations such as skin infiltrates or effusions). Regarding the leukocyte count, the diagnositc cutoff is <13 G/L for dysplastic CMML and ≥13 G/l for proliferative CMML.

The WHO classification 2022 further distinguishes between two CMML subgroups taking into account the blast content (see Table 3). The description of rare CMML variants, such as oligomonocytic CMML, CMML with associated systemic mastocytosis, CMML with concomitant myeloid/lymphoid neoplasia is available in a consensus paper referring to the details [18]. In parallel to WHO, an "International Consensus Classification" was proposed by another working group, which differs only marginally from the WHO proposals.

Table 3: CMML subgroups by WHO classification (2022): [19] 



Bone marrow

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia I


≤4% blasts

uni- or bicytopenia,

persistent monocytosis in peripheral blood: >500/µl over 3 months, comprising >10% of leukocytes, with genetically aberrant marker or >1000/ µl, comprising >10% of leukocytes, without genetic marker (see also complete diagnostic criteria Table 1),

no Auer rods

≤9% blasts, dysplasias in >10% of cells in 1-3 rows, no Auer rods,

no BCR::ABL1, PDGFR α or β, FGFR1, PCM1::JAK2, no MLN-TK.

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia II


5-19% blasts,

uni- or bicytopenia,

persistent monocytosis in peripheral blood: (>500/µl over 3 months, comprising >10% of leukocytes, with genetically aberrant marker or >1000/ µl, comprising >10% of leukocytes, without genetic marker (see also complete diagnostic criteria Table 1).

Auer rods possible

10-19% blasts, dysplasias in >10% of cells in 1-3 rows, Auer rods possible.

No BCR::ABL1, PDGFR α or β, FGFR1, PCM1::JAK2, no MLN-TK.

5.4Prognostic factors

Important prognostic parameters for patients with CMML are patient-specific parameters such as age, gender and concomitant diseases and disease-specific parameters such as peripheral and medullary blast percentage, the extent of cytopenia, need for erythrocyte transfusion, chromosomal and molecular findings. MDS-specific prognosis scores are of limited value in assessment of prognosis because parameters important for MDS are rarely present in CMML. The best prognostic tools to date are the CPSS (CMML-specific prognostic scoring system, Table 4 and the CPSS-molecular, Table 5).

The CPSS includes the following parameters as risk factors to define 4 risk groups: a leukocyte count of >13,000/µl, a medullary blast percentage of ≥10%, regular transfusion requirements, and cytogenetic findings (Table 4). Molecular markers were added to the CPSS, and the blast threshold was lowered to >5%. This score (CPSS-M) also defines 4 risk groups and is especially appropriate for the identification of low-risk and high-risk patients (Table 5).

In absence of cytogenetic and molecular genetic data, the prognosis of patients with CMML can also be estimated using the Düsseldorf score [2024]. This score identifies a small group of low-risk patients and a small group of high-risk patients, whereas a large proportion of cases are assigned to the intermediate group.

Table 4: CPSS [23]. 


score points




WHO type



FAB type (leukocyte count)






Transfusion requirements*



Cytogenetic risk group


normal, -Y


other anomalies


+8, complex karyotype and abnormalities of chromosome 7

CPSS risk group

score points



Intermediate 1


Intermediate 2




*Transfusion requirement defined as ≥2 erythrocyte concentrates (EC) every 8 weeks for 4 months.
Table 5: CPSS molecular [24]. 

Score points

cytogenetic risk group



















Cytogenetic risk group


normal, -Y


other abnomalities


+8, complex karyotype and abnormalities of chromosome 7

Genetic score risk groups

score points



Intermediate 1


Intermediate 2




Score points

genetic risk group

bone marrow blasts


transfusion requirements












intermediate 2



Transfusion requirements defined as >2 ECs every 8 weeks for 4 months.

CPSS molecular risk groups

score points



Intermediate 1


Intermediate 2




5.5Differential diagnosis

It is essential to exclude other clonal myeloproliferative disorders, as well as reactive causes of splenomegaly, leukocytosis, monocytosis, and cytopenia. Similar, but reactive blood count changes, especially monocytosis, may appear during acute infections, sepsis, chronic infections, TBC, and rheumatic and autoimmune diseases. Other non-hematologic diseases, which can cause splenomegaly (liver and systemic diseases, infections, congenital storage diseases), are a matter of exclusion.

Clonal hematological neoplasms that may be relevant for differential diagnosis of CMML include other forms of MDS and MPN, in particular MPN with neutrophilia (formerly atypical CML) and PMF. Very rare but therapeutically relevant differential diagnoses of monocytosis are myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia (PDGFRα or β rearrangement), with tyrosine kinase fusion genes (MLN-TK), hairy cell leukemia (splenomegaly and pancytopenia), or LGL leukemias. Monocytosis can also occur in the transformation from MDS or MPN to AML M4 or M5 and in systemic mastocytosis (KIT D816V mutation) (see Onkopedia guideline systemic mastocytosis (German Version)). However, there are also patients with CMML who acquire a KIT D816V mutation during the course of the disease. Differential diagnoses and appropriate diagnostic procedures are shown in Table 6.

Table 6: Differential diagnosis of CMML. 

Differential diagnosis

diagnostic procedure

Reactive bone marrow changes (sepsis, HIV, chronic infections, TBC, auto-immune diseases, etc.).

cytology, anamnesis, laboratory

Monocytosis of other cause

medical history, laboratory

Immune thrombocytopenia

cytology, anamnesis, disease course

Hypersplenic syndrome, congenital storage disease

medical history/ clinical picture/ splenomegaly

Acute leukemias (M4, M5)


Myeloproliferative disorders (esspecially PMF, MPN-U, systemic mastocytosis with associated clonal hematologic neoplasia (SM-AHN), CGL, chronic eosinophil leukemia/hypereosinophilia)

histology, cytogenetics, molecular genetics

Hairy cell leukemia, LGL

cytology, immunophenotyping

Other myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (JMML, MDS/MPN-U, MPN with neutrophilia, MLN-TK)

histology, cytogenetics, molecular genetics


6.1General principles of therapy

For the almost elderly patients, maintaining or improving quality of life and autonomy is the main goal of therapeutic efforts. In many asymptomatic CMML patients with mild cytopenia and lack of symptoms, a watch and wait strategy is appropriate. The indication for disease-specific therapy is depending on the stage of disease, age and clinical condition of the patient. In low-risk CMML patients (CPSS LOW and CPSS INT-1), therapy is mostly not indicated, which is in part due to the lack of validated therapeutic interventions. Patients with high-risk CMML (CPSS INT-2 and CPSS HIGH) should be treated cytoreductively, if necessary, also with the intention of delaying progression to AML [2533]. A treatment algorithm is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Therapy of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia. 
curative therapy; palliative therapy;
1 CPSS - CMML-Specific Prognostic Scoring System, see chapter 5.4
2 allo SCT - allogeneic stem cell transplantation

6.2Therapy modalities


There are no surgical measures specific to CMML.


In exceptional cases, splenic irradiation may be considered for extremely enlarged spleens causing clinical problems.

6.2.3Therapy of symptomatic or advanced CMML

In CMML requiring therapy, the basis of any treatment is a good supportive therapy, which includes erythrocyte transfusions as well as sufficient treatment of concomitant diseases. In a significant proportion of patients, thrombocytopenia is the most frequent indication for starting therapy. Anemia, especially in older patients, leads to fatigue, increased incidence of falls with risk of fractures, and reduced cognition and quality of life. Clinically relevant neutropenia is rare. A large multicenter retrospective analysis including over 900 cases describes the results of first-line therapy with azacytidine compared to hydroxycarbamid [34]. This study showed a median survival of 20.7 months with azacytidine compared with 15.6 months with hydroxycarbamid. Of course, because this was a retrospective analysis, it cannot be ruled out that there were generally more patients with less severe concomitant disease and a selection bias for azacytidine therapy. A prospective phase 3 study in MP-CMML patients compared hydroxycarbamid with decitabine, here no survival advantage and no advantage in event-free survival could be found [35].

6.2.4Supportive therapy

The main component of supportive therapy is the transfusion of red blood cells depending on the clinical condition of the individual patient (not depending on a defined Hb threshold; exception: in severe coronary artery disease and/or other severe concomitant diseases, the Hb value should be kept above 9 g/dl).

Clinically significant bleeding is to be expected mainly above a threshold of <10 G/l platelets, although CMML patients may experience bleeding complications even with higher platelet counts. If possible, platelet concentrate substitution should not be prophylactic (exception: high fever, severe infection) but should only be used in case of clinical bleeding signs (risk of allo-immunization). In each case, the therapy decision must be individually adapted to the situation of the patient and the facility providing care (practice, special outpatient clinic with emergency care, etc.). and vaccinations

The use of antibiotics in case of infections (also trivial infections) should be generous, especially in neutropenic patients, whereas routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not indicated. However, the general recommendation of vaccination against pneumococci (STIKO recommendation above the age of 65), COVID-19 and influenza should be followed.

Treatment of concomitant diseases (lung disease, heart disease, etc.) is an important part of the overall therapy.

6.2.5Iron chelators

Polytransfused patients are at risk for concomitant secondary hemochromatosis (especially cardiomyopathy). Therefore, therapy with iron chelators may be considered in patients with a life expectancy of more than 2 years who receive at least 20 red cell concentrates or have a serum ferritin level of >1000 ng/ml (strength of evidence IIa, recommendation grade D).

6.2.6Hematopoietic growth factors

Therapy with erythropoiesis stimulating factors (ESF, classical: erythropoietin 150-300 U/kg of body weight, 3 times/week s.c., or 500 U/kg weekly s.c.; delay erythropoietin: 150 µg or 300 µg weekly s.c.) should be considered in the following anemic patients (strength of evidence Ib, grade of recommendation A) [151627].

  • erythropoietin level <200 IU/ml

  • low transfusion dependency (maximum 2 EC in 8 weeks)

  • blast cells not >10%

  • dysplastic variant of CMML

The response is to be expected after 6 months of therapy at the latest. If the patient fails to respond, treatment should be discontinued. The availability of thrombopoietic growth factors (romiplostim, eltrombopag) offers the possibility of treating severe thrombocytopenia in low-risk CMML. However, these drugs are not approved for CMML and can therefore only be used off-label or within clinical trials.

6.2.7Special therapies chemotherapy

Intensive chemotherapy analogous to AML is not an established treatment option for mostly elderly CMML patients outside of trials and especially without subsequent allogeneic SCT. Whether intensive chemotherapy is useful in individual cases (e.g., for remission induction before planned allogeneic SCT) can only be decided on an individual basis, taking into account the risk-benefit ratio. chemotherapy

For many patients with proliferative CMML, hydroxycarbamide is the preferred standard therapy to control proliferation including splenomegaly. The first randomized trial [33] demonstrated a survival benefit over etoposide. Other non-intensive chemotherapy such as low-dose cytarabine (20 mg/m²/day from day 1 to 14) or low-dose melphalan (2 mg/day) has been used in the absence of better therapeutic alternatives in advanced CMML. The availability of demethylating agents may offer another therapeutic option. therapy

Azacytidine and decitabine are pyrimidine analogs that are incorporated into DNA instead of cytosine. Both agents have a direct cytotoxic effect on proliferating cells. In addition, they prevent the methylation of CpG segments (so-called CpG) in DNA by irreversibly binding and thus inhibiting the enzyme DNA methyltransferase (DNMT-1). Both substances have been evaluated in phase II and randomized phase III studies.

In two randomized trials in patients with MDS (and in some patients with MD-CMML), treatment with 5-azacytidine was shown to have an advantage over supportive therapy alone. Other phase II trials with homogeneous cohorts of CMML patients (dysplastic and proliferative) showed comparable efficacy to MDS patients. However, the only related randomized trial in MP-CMML comparing hydroxycarbamide and decitabine was negative and did not show a survival benefit or better EFS with decitabine [35]. No prospective randomized data are available on the use of azacytidine specifically for CMML. According to the approval of azacytidine, blast excess and CMML with <13,000/µl leukocytes (dysplastic variant) can be treated with this agent when allogeneic SCT is not possible (strength of evidence Ib, recommendation grade A). The standard AZA-7 regimen is given subcutaneously or intravenously at 75 mg/m2 for 7 days. Cycles are repeated at 28-day intervals. Because the effect of epigenetic modulation occurs almost slowly, at least 6 cycles of azacitidine should be administered before an assessment of response can be made. If there is a response (at least improvement in peripheral blood counts), therapy should be continued. The optimal number of cycles has not yet been defined. It can be assumed that patients who respond will also benefit from continuation of therapy. Predictive factors for response to azacytidine have not been established. In the course of treatment with a demethylating therapy, resistance usually develops. In this case, switching to the other available demethylating drug (i.e. from azacytidine to decitabine or vice versa) is not officially recommended, but may induce a new response in individual cases.


The oral JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib is approved for the treatment of primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-PV/post-ET myelofibrosis and polycythaemia vera. Ruxolitinib positively affects disease-associated symptoms (by reducing the production of inflammatory cytokines) and splenomegaly in particular in these diseases. Small case series [3637] suggest that ruxolitinib may also have a positive effect on these symptoms in CMML (off-label use).

6.2.9Allogeneic stem cell transplantation

At present, allogeneic SCT remains the only curative treatment option for CMML. This therapy is applicable less frequently with increasing age. Therefore, a bias must be taken into account when comparing the survival of the transplanted patients with non-transplanted patients, as transplanted patients are younger and with better general health, which both have a significant influence on overall survival. At this time, there is no study randomizing patients to a transplant arm versus a different type of therapy. Therefore, the possible advantages of allogeneic SCT in CMML must be weighed against the known disadvantages of this treatment approach.

There are studies on allogeneic SCT in CMML, but no prospectively controlled studies. Compared to other myeloid neoplasms, the results with allogeneic SCT are disappointing. A study by Liu et al [28] of 209 allogeneic transplanted CMML patients showed a long-term survival of 26% in the low-risk groups and 14% in the high-risk groups. Another relatively large study of 513 patients was conducted by the EBMT. This study showed a 4-year overall survival of about 30%, which was dependend on the chosen conditioning regimen [29]. The French study group also published a study on allogeneic SCT in CMML in 2013. Seventy-three patients were studied, and the 3-year survival was 30%, similar to other studies [30]. The negative outcome after allogeneic SCT is approximately half due to recurrences of the underlying disease and half due to SCT-related problems such as GvHD, toxicity, etc. It is presently a matter of discussion, whether overall survival improves, if complete remission was achieved prior to allogeneic SCT. Some retrospective study results suggest a better outcome of transplantation in CMML patients, if they have been previously treated with hypomethylating agents compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy [31]. In summary, for younger patients in good clinical condition and at higher risk, allogeneic SCT remains the therapy of choice. However, a clear defintion of this “higher risk” is currently pending.

6.2.10Autologous stem cell transplantation

Autologous SCT is not a treatment option for patients with CMML.

6.2.11Therapeutic options in the presence of CMML with concomitant mastocytosis

For patients with CMML and concomitant mastocytosis approved agents as avapritinib and midostaurin are available. For details, see Oncopedia: Mastocytosis (German Version only). Avapritinib was recently approved by the FDA in SM-AHN including CMML [4041].

6.3Summary of therapy options

Most patients with CMML are in advanced age. For these patients non-intensive therapies and good supportive care represent the basis of therapy. In younger patients with high-risk CMML, the possibility of allogeneic SCT has always to be considered first. High-risk CMML patients with dysplastic variant who do not qualify for this procedure may receive treatment with azacytidine. Patients with proliferative variant, should primarily treated with hydroxycarbamide, although azacytidine or decitabine may be effective, but are not approved [42]. As mentioned above, there was no advantage to using decitabine compared with hydroxycarbamide in a randomized trial of decitabine. Therefore, if applicable, its use should be considered only in cases of progression to AML (≥20% blasts). In cases of progression on standard treatment and high-risk constellations, patients should be included in ongoing clinical trials when possible. Further information is available from the Acute and Chronic Leukemia Competence Network, the Düsseldorf MDS Registry, and the German MDS Study Group. A European guideline summarizes the essential diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The Austrian CMML Biodatabase [43] will help to provide sufficient material from CMML patients with appropriate data set (see links in chapter 14).


7.1Progress control

Clinical examination of spleen size and, if necessary, abdominal sonography are useful once a year. The intervals of the examination of blood count including differential blood picture and clinical chemistry depend on the individual course of the disease and the respective form and phase of therapy. In the initial phase of therapy, the controls should be more frequent. In case of reaching a stable phase, control intervals up to a quarter of a year or longer may be possible. Follow-up examinations of the bone marrow to detect transformation to acute leukemia are required according to the individual course. If there is evidence of progression (increasing anemia or thrombocytopenia, blasts in the peripheral blood, etc.), a follow-up examination of the bone marrow should be considered. Follow-up examinations of somatic mutations and karyotype are indicated if therapeutic consequences arise. Expansion of the present genetic aberrations or evolution with appearance of further genetic aberrations can occur. Both can influence the prognosis and the course of the disease.

The follow-up of CMML after allogeneic SCT does not differ significantly from the follow-up of other transplanted hemopathies. Center-specific guidelines should be followed, which often include quarterly follow-up in the first year, four-monthly follow-up in the second year, and six-monthly follow-up in subsequent years. This should include chimerism analysis, cytology, histology, and MRD tracking of CMML specific initial changes (cytometry of abnormal monocytes and blasts, karyotype abnormalities, mutations in NGS and molecular biology) in order to detect molecular relapse as early as possible and to be able to counteract it before morphological relapse. This can be done, for example, by withdrawal of immunosuppression, transfusion of donor lymphocytes, and hypomethylating therapy. Regular dermatologic, cardiologic, and gynecologic (in women) examinations should be performed after allogeneic transplantation to detect secondary malignancies early after allogeneic SCT. Even if it is assumed that a patient is cured, differential blood counts should be performed regularly, at least annually, to detect early relapse, secondary MDS, or secondary leukemia. Densitometry in regular intervals is also indicated.

Table 7: Follow-up examinations in CMML 




Clinical examination, abdominal sonography if necessary.

Hematopoietic insufficiency/ proliferation.

Blood count and differential blood count

Increased cell turnover


Clonal evolution

Cytogenetics, somatic mutations in the course, if applicable.

After allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Chimerism, bone marrow cytology/histology, cytogenetics, somatic mutations in progression if applicable.

8[Kapitel nicht relevant]


  1. Neukirchen J, Schoonen WM, Strupp C et al: Incidence and prevalence of myelodysplastic syndromes: data from the Düsseldorf MDS-registry. Leuk Res 35:1591-1596, 2011. DOI:10.1016/j.leukres.2011.06.001

  2. Itzykson R, Kosmider O, Renneville A et al: Clonal architecture of chronic myelomonocytic leukemias. Blood 121:2186-2198, 2013. DOI:10.1182/blood-2012-06-440347

  3. Zoi K, Cross NC: Molecular pathogenesis of atypical CML, CMML and MDS/MPN-unclassifiable. Int J Hematol 101:229-242, 2015. DOI:10.1007/s12185-014-1670-3

  4. Droin N, Jacquel A, Hendra JB et al: Alpha-defensins secreted by dysplastic granulocytes inhibit the differentiation of monocytes in chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia, Blood 115:78-88, 2010. DOI:10.1182/blood-2009-05-224352

  5. Strom SS, Gu Y, Gruschkus SK et al: Risk Factors of Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Case-Control Study. Leukemia 19:1912-1918, 2005. DOI:10.1038/sj.leu.2403945

  6. Gross SA, Irons RD, Scott PK et al: A Case-Control Study of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) in Shanghai, China: Evaluation of Risk Factors for CMML, With Special Focus on Benzene, Arch Environ Occup Health 67:206-218, 2012. DOI:10.1080/19338244.2011.627892

  7. Rigolin GM, Cuneo A, Roberti MG et al: et al, Exposure to myelotoxic agents and myelodysplasia: case-control study and correlation with clinicobiological findings, Br J Haematol 103:189-197, 1998. PMID:9792307

  8. Takahashi K, Pemmaraju N, Strati P et al: Clinical characteristics and outcomes of therapy-related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood 122:2807-2811, 2013. DOI:10.1182/blood-2013-03-491399

  9. Churpek JE, Smith-Simmer K: 2021 Oct 28. In: Adam MP, Everman DB, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Gripp KW, Amemiya A, editors. DDX41-Associated Familial Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2023. PMID:34723452

  10. Hadjadj J, Michel M, Chauveheid MP et al: Immune thrombocytopenia in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Eur J Haematol 93: 521-526, 2014. DOI:10.1111/ejh.12393

  11. Zipperer E, Tanha N, Strupp C et al: The myelodysplastic syndrome-comorbidity index provides additional prognostic information on patients stratified according to the revised international prognostic scoring system. Haematologica 99:e31-32, 2014. DOI:10.3324/haematol.2013.101055

  12. Germing U, Gattermann N, Minning H et al: Problems in the classification of CMML-dysplastic versus proliferative type. Leuk Res 22:871-878, 1998 PMID:9766745

  13. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT et al: The chronic myeloid leukaemias: guidelines for distinguishing chronic granulocytic, atypical chronic myeloid, and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. Proposals by the French-American-British Cooperative Leukaemia Group. Br J Haematol 87: 746-752, 1994. PMID:7986717

  14. Schuler E, Schroeder M, Neukirchen J et al: Refined medullary blast and white blood cell count based classification of chronic myelomonocytic leukemias. Leuk Res 38:1413-1419, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.leukres.2014.09.003

  15. Orazi A, Bennett JM, Germing U et al: Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. In: Swerdlow S.H. CE, Harris N.L., Jaffe E.S., Pileri S.A., Stein H., Thiele J., Vardiman J.W. WHO Classification of Tumors of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon (France): IARC; Ch. 5, 2017.

  16. Savona MR, Malcovati L, Komrokji R et al: MDS/MPN International Working Group. An international consortium proposal of uniform response criteria for myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) in adults. Blood 125:1857-1865, 2015. DOI:10.1182/blood-2014-10-607341

  17. Selimoglu-Buet D, Wagner-Ballon O, Saada V et al: Characteristic repartition of monocyte subsets as a diagnostic signature of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood 125:3618-3626, 2015. DOI:10.1182/blood-2015-01-620781

  18. Valent P, Orazi A, Savona M, et al: Proposed diagnostic criteria for classical chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), CMML variants and pre-CMML conditions. Haematologica 2019 104, 1935-1949. DOI:10.3324/haematol.2019.222059

  19. Khoury J, Solary E, Abla O etal: The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms. Leukemia 36:1703-1719, 2022. DOI:10.1038/s41375-022-01613-1

  20. Germing U, Kündgen A, Gattermann N: Risk assessment in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Leuk Lymphoma 45:1311-1318, 2004. DOI:10.1080/1042819042000207271

  21. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J et al: Revised international prognostic scoring system. Blood 120:2454-2465, 2012. DOI:10.1182/blood-2012-03-420489

  22. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM et al: International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 89:2079-2088, 1997 PMID:9058730

  23. Such E, Germing U, Malcovati L et al: Development and validation of a prognostic scoring system for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Integrating clinical features and genetic lesions in the risk assessment of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood 121:3005-3015, 2013. DOI:10.1182/blood-2012-08-452938

  24. Elena C, Gallì A, Such E et al: Integrating clinical features and genetic lesions in the risk assessment of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood 128:1408-1417, 2016. DOI:10.1182/blood-2016-05-714030

  25. Padron E, Garcia-Manero G, Patnaik MM et al: An international data set for CMML validates prognostic scoring systems and demonstrates a need for novel prognostication strategies Blood Cancer J 5:e333, 2015. DOI:10.1038/bcj.2015.53

  26. Padron E, Komrokji R, List AF: The clinical management of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 12:172-178, 2014. PMID:24927265

  27. Xicoy B, Germing U, Jimenez MJ et al: Response to erythropoietic-stimulating agents in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Eur J Haematol 97:33-38, 2016. DOI:10.1111/ejh.12679

  28. Liu HD, Ahn KW, Hu ZH et al: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 23:767-776, 2017. DOI:10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.01.078

  29. Symeonidis A, van Biezen A, de Wreede L et al: Achievement of complete remission predicts outcome of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. A study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Br J Haematol 171:239-246, 2015. DOI:10.1111/bjh.13576

  30. Park S, Labopin M, Yakoub-Agha I et al: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a report from the Societé Française de Greffe de Moelle et de Therapie Cellulaire. European J of Haematology 90:355-364, 2013. DOI:10.1111/ejh.12073

  31. Kongtim P, Popat U, Jimenez A et al: Treatment with hypomethylating agents before allogeneic stem cell transplantation improves progression-free survival for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 22: 47-53, 2016. DOI:10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.08.031

  32. Schuler E, Frank R, Hildebrandt B et al: Myelodysplastic syndromes without peripheral monocytosis but with evidence of marrow monocytosis share clinical and molecular characteristics with CMML. Leuk Res 65:1-4, 2017. DOI:10.1016/j.leukres.2017.12.002

  33. Wattel E, Guerci A, Hecquet B et al: A randomized trial of hydroxyurea versus VP16 in adult chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Groupe Français des Myélodysplasies and European CMML Group. Blood 88:2480-2487, 1996. PMID:8839839.

  34. Pleyer L, Leisch M, Kourakli A et al: Outcomes of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia treated with non-curative therapies: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Haematol 2021 Feb;8(2):e135-e148. DOI:10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30374-4

  35. Itzykson R, Santini V, Thepot S et al: Decitabine Versus Hydroxyurea for Advanced Proliferative Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial Within the EMSCO Network. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 1: JCO2200437. DOI:10.1200/JCO.22.00437. online ahead of print.

  36. Francke S, Mies A, Meggendorfer M et al: Disease-modifying activity of ruxolitinib in a patient with JAK2-negative CMML-2. Leuk Lymphoma 58:1271-1272, 2017. DOI:10.1080/10428194.2016.1225209

  37. Hunter AM, Newman H, Dezern AE et al: Integrated Human and Murine Clinical Study Establishes Clinical Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 27:6095-6105, 2021. DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0935

  38. Gagelmann N, Bogdanov R, Stölzel F et al: Long-Term Survival Benefit after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia. Transplant Cell Ther 27:95.e1-95.e4, 2021. DOI:10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.10.007

  39. Patnaik MM, Tefferi A: CMML: 2022 Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2022 Mar 1;97(3):352-372. DOI:10.1002/ajh.26455. epub 2022 Jan 27. PMID:34985762

  40. DeAngelo DJ, Radia DH, George TI et al: Safety and efficacy of avapritinib in advanced systemic mastocytosis: the phase 1 EXPLORER trial. Nat Med 2183-2191, 2021. DOI:10.1038/s41591-021-01538-9

  41. Gotlib J, Reiter A, Radia DH et al: Efficacy and safety of avapritinib in advanced systemic mastocytosis: interim analysis of the phase 2 PATHFINDER trial. Nat Med 27:2192-2199, 2021. DOI:10.1038/s41591-021-01539-8

  42. Itzykson R, Fenaux P, Bowen D et al: Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemias in Adults: Recommendations From the European Hematology Association and the European LeukemiaNet. Hemasphere 2:e150, 201.. DOI:10.1016/j.leukres.2019.106269

  43. Geissler K, Jäger E, Barna A et al: The Austrian biodatabase for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (ABCMML: A representative and useful real-life data source for further biomedical research. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 131(17-18):410-418, 2019. DOI:10.1007/s00508-019-1526-1

10Active studies

Currently, there is no specific study for CMML patients in the German-speaking area

11Systemic Therapy - Protocols

12Study results

13Certification Status

15Authors' Affiliations

Prof. Dr. med. Ulrich Germing
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Klinische Immunologie
Moorenstr. 5
40225 Düsseldorf
PD Dr. Sabine Blum
Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois
Rue du Bugnon 21
CH-1011 Lausanne, Vaud
Prof. Dr. med. Michael Lübbert
Medizinische Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik
Abteilung Hämatologie u. Onkologie
Hugstetter Str. 55
79106 Freiburg
Prof. Dr. med. Georgia Metzgeroth
Universitätsklinikum Mannheim
Medizinische Klinik III
Hämatologie und Intern. Onkologie
Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3
68167 Mannheim
Prof. Dr. med. Uwe Platzbecker
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I
Hämatologie und Zelltherapie
Liebigstr. 22, Haus 7
04103 Leipzig
Prof. Dr. Michael Pfeilstöcker
Medizinische Abteilung - Hämatologie / Onkologie
Heinrich-Collin-Str. 30
A-1140 Wien

16Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

Author Employer1 Consulting / Expert opinion2 Shares / Funds3 Patent / Copyright / License 4 Fees5 Funding of scientific research6 Other financial relations7 Personal relationship with authorized representatives8
Blum, Sabine
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Schweiz
Germing, Ulrich
Uniklinik Düsseldorf
Novartis, BMS, Janssen
BMS, Abbvie, Novartis
Lübbert, Michael
Univ.-Klinik Freiburg
Ad.boards: AbbVie, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Hexal, Janssen, Otsuka, Pfizer, Syros
Finanzierung eines Forschungsvorhabens: Janssen-Cilag Studienware: Cheplapharm, Janssen, Aristopharm, TEVA
Metzgeroth, Georgia
III. Medizinische Klinik Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
GSK, Vifor
GSK,Vifor, Novartis, Celgene, BMS, Roche
Pfeilstöcker, Michael
Hanusch Krankenhaus der Österreichischen Gesundheitskasse H.Collinstr 30 1140 Wien Österreich
Abbvie, BMS, Jazz, Sobi
Abbvie, BMS, Novartis
BMS: projektbezogene Finanzierung statistische Auswertungen
Reisekostenerstattung BMS,
Platzbecker, Uwe
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
BMS, Janssen, Geron, Amgen, Abbvie, Novartis, Jazz
BMS, Janssen, Geron, Amgen, Abbvie, Novartis, Jazz
BMS, Janssen, Geron, Amgen, Abbvie, Novartis, Jazz
1 - Current employer, relevant previous employers in the last 3 years (institution/location).
2 - Activity as a consultant or expert or paid participation in a scientific advisory board of a company in the health care industry (e.g., pharmaceutical industry, medical device industry), a commercially oriented contract research organization, or an insurance company.
3 - Ownership of business shares, stocks, funds with participation of companies of the health care industry.
4 - Relates to drugs and medical devices.
5 - Honoraria for lecturing and training activities or paid authors or co-authorships on behalf of a company in the health care industry, a commercially oriented contracting institute or an insurance company.
6 - Financial support (third-party funds) for research projects or direct financing of employees of the institution by a company in the health care industry, a commercially oriented contract institute or an insurance company.
7 - Other financial relationships, e.g., gifts, travel reimbursements, or other payments in excess of 100 euros outside of research projects, if paid by an entity that has an investment in, license to, or other commercial interest in the subject matter of the investigation.
8 - Personal relationship with an authorized representative(s) of a healthcare company.




Onkopedia-Leitlinien werden kontinuierlich an den Stand des Wissens angepasst. Die jeweils gültige Version, AGB und Nutzungsbedingungen finden Sie unter www.onkopedia.com.

Für die kommerzielle Nutzung wenden Sie sich bitte an onkopedia@dgho.de.

Onkopedia guidelines are continuously adapted to the state of knowledge. The currently valid version, terms of use and general terms and conditions can be found at onkopedia-guidelines.info.

For commercial use, please contact onkopedia@dgho.de.